2023-03-06 19:24:13 +0000 | answered a question | NAS-PDU confusion Hi, this is the expected PDU content when the UE as a valid security context available. See 3GPP 24.501 for details. |
2022-11-03 16:36:07 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2022-11-03 16:36:07 +0000 | answered a question | Merge request question Please let time to reviewers to go though your changes: they are all volunteers doing this on their spare time and somet |
2022-05-06 14:07:34 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2022-05-06 14:07:34 +0000 | answered a question | Will there be an NAS-5GS over UDP dissector? Hi, done in this merge request. |
2022-05-06 12:09:33 +0000 | answered a question | 5G SIB8 (CMAS) [Expert Info (Error/Malformed): Number of pages should be <=15 (found 201)] Hi Norbie, the warning message fragment payload is invalid for a SIB8 with a single fragment, thus the error generated. |
2022-05-06 12:09:33 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2022-01-24 16:23:20 +0000 | commented question | F1SetUpRequest is not decoded completely Well for me this is clearly a non compliance with 3GPP specifications that should be addressed. |
2022-01-18 15:32:24 +0000 | commented question | F1SetUpRequest is not decoded completely Could you clarify why your system put a BCCH DL-SCH message for the SIB1? This does not seem to match the SIB1 definitio |
2022-01-13 07:45:54 +0000 | commented question | F1SetUpRequest is not decoded completely So does the SIB1 container contains a SIB1 message and not a BCCH-DL-SCH message, as suggested by 3GPP 38.473? Could you |
2022-01-11 17:29:14 +0000 | commented question | F1SetUpRequest is not decoded completely So does the SIB1 container contains a SIB1 message and not a BCCH-DL-SCH message, as uggested by 3GPP 38.473? Could you |
2021-12-16 16:10:14 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2021-12-16 16:10:14 +0000 | answered a question | NR-RRC : how to decrypt encrypt NR-RRC message in pcap Hi, deciphering is not supported due to copyright reasons. |
2021-12-03 12:10:09 +0000 | answered a question | Does wireshark decode the content of RRCContainer in UE CTX MOD REQ? Hi, Wireshark currently does not support decoding the RRC container in the UE context modification request message, so |
2021-12-03 12:10:09 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2021-08-25 19:23:41 +0000 | commented answer | does wireshark 3.4.7 support 3gpp release 16 for NAS? That's correct, you should use the 3.5.0 development builds as a release upgrade is not a bugfix and thus is not candida |
2021-08-25 19:23:17 +0000 | commented answer | does wireshark 3.4.7 support 3gpp release 16 for NAS? That's correct, you should use the 3.5.0 development builds as a release upgrade is not a bugfix and thus is not candida |
2021-08-25 19:22:07 +0000 | commented answer | does wireshark 3.4.7 support 3gpp release 16 for NAS? That's correct, you should use the 3.5.0 development builds found here: https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ |
2021-08-25 19:20:57 +0000 | commented answer | does wireshark 3.4.7 support 3gpp release 16 for NAS? That's correct, you should use the 3.5.0 development builds found here: https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ |
2021-08-25 19:20:13 +0000 | commented answer | does wireshark 3.4.7 support 3gpp release 16 for NAS? That's correct, you should use the the 3.5.0 development builds found here: https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated |
2021-05-28 09:35:11 +0000 | answered a question | NBIOT wireshark support for RRC connection setup Hi, If it is decoded as a RRC connection reestablishment it means that you payload is not a RRC connection setup. Pleas |
2021-05-28 09:35:11 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-11-23 18:49:36 +0000 | answered a question | Any roadmap for upgrade NAS-5GS dissector to R16? NAS-5GS dissector is now compliant with v16.6.0 starting from Wireshark v3.5.0rc0-194-gd75fef88fb. |
2020-11-06 21:04:37 +0000 | commented question | Any roadmap for upgrade NAS-5GS dissector to R16? I intend to upgrade the dissector soon, I'm simply lacking the spare time and energy to upgrade it. It will come soon. |
2020-11-01 09:25:40 +0000 | received badge | ● Associate Editor (source) |
2020-11-01 09:25:40 +0000 | edited answer | No capture from a pipe after upgrading to 3.4 Capture from stdin in Windows is currently broken and will be fixed in 3.4.1. The fix is under review here. |
2020-10-31 10:58:27 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-10-31 10:58:27 +0000 | answered a question | No capture from a pipe after upgrading to 3.4 Capture from stdin in Windows is currently borken and will be fixed in 3.4.1. The fix is under review here. |
2020-07-15 14:28:05 +0000 | answered a question | Debugging Dissector Read and Dissector Handoff Issue Hi, 1/ please clarify your current output and what you would like to have 2/ FT_BOOLEAN should use TFS(), not VALS(). |
2020-07-15 14:28:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-05-06 19:12:47 +0000 | answered a question | Cmake error: "Target "xxx" INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES property contains path: ... which is prefixed in the build directory." Hi, move the wireshark-win64-libs-3.2 folder outside of your build tree and update your WIRESHARK_LIB_DIR accordingly, |
2020-05-06 19:12:47 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-04-13 20:03:46 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-04-13 20:03:46 +0000 | answered a question | How to decode LTE RRC HandoverCommand Right now there is no named dissector registered for the HandoverCommand PDU. You need to have it encapsulated in a a S1 |
2020-04-10 19:14:58 +0000 | commented answer | UMTS_RRC_MEasurement Report Well, nowhere in your question it was clear that you had a pcap that would match this proprietary log. If you expect to |
2020-04-10 13:46:15 +0000 | answered a question | UMTS_RRC_MEasurement Report Hi, tshark cannot read this proprietary log format, so you are out of luck. Best regards, Pascal. |
2020-04-10 13:46:15 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-03-05 13:40:51 +0000 | answered a question | npcap package with wireshark installer encounter Unknown error! 800f0203 during installation Hi Dan, better report this and ask for help on the Npcap bug tracker: https://github.com/nmap/nmap/issues Best regards |
2020-03-05 13:40:51 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-02-27 09:59:43 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-02-27 09:59:43 +0000 | answered a question | use multiple ports for HTTP2 You can use the Analyze -> Decode As to add extra TCP ports for HTTP2 decoding. |
2020-02-12 19:48:21 +0000 | commented answer | is it possible to call rrc dissector to decode rrc containers in F1AP? Thiss is now implemented in https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/36084/ |
2020-02-12 07:03:49 +0000 | commented answer | is it possible to call rrc dissector to decode rrc containers in F1AP? Create an enhancement bug on bugs.wireshark.org and attach the pcap |
2020-02-11 17:15:27 +0000 | edited answer | is it possible to call rrc dissector to decode rrc containers in F1AP? The F1AP dissector should already handle UL CCCH messages. For DCCH messages, what you have is NR PDCP PDUs and not RRC |
2020-02-11 17:13:13 +0000 | edited answer | is it possible to call rrc dissector to decode rrc containers in F1AP? The F1AP dissector should already handle DL and UL CCCH messages. For DCCH messages, what you have is NR PDCP PDUs and n |
2020-02-11 17:13:00 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2020-02-11 17:13:00 +0000 | answered a question | is it possible to call rrc dissector to decode rrc containers in F1AP? The F1AP dissector should already handled DL and UL CCCH messages. For DCCH messages, what you have is NR PDCP PDUs and |
2020-02-01 10:02:40 +0000 | commented answer | why nr-rrc dissectors are not called in pdcp-nr And calling NR RRC dissector is now implemented in Wireshark v3.3.0rc0-479-g4ef8ace610 |
2020-02-01 08:13:24 +0000 | edited answer | why nr-rrc dissectors are not called in pdcp-nr Hi, 1/ the code is ready to call the NR-RRC disssector but the lookup_rrc_dissector_handle() was never finished. I'm go |
2020-02-01 08:13:11 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |