| 2020-11-13 14:40:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2020-11-13 14:40:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2019-10-12 21:56:22 +0000 | marked best answer | TCP much larger than 1460 bytes? I do not understand, why a see a lot of packets much larger than 1460 bytes. On different Win10 devices in my LAN. The network adapters on the devices are set to MTU 1500, switch has MTU 1518. No device in my LAN has MTU more than 1518 bytes. The MSS in the SYN-packets show 1460 bytes. Why are there packets with much more than 1460 bytes? |
| 2019-10-12 21:56:22 +0000 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
| 2019-10-12 12:18:38 +0000 | commented answer | TCP much larger than 1460 bytes? Thanks for explanation. |
| 2019-10-12 12:18:04 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2019-10-12 12:18:04 +0000 | answered a question | TCP much larger than 1460 bytes? Thanks for explanation. |
| 2019-10-12 07:57:01 +0000 | asked a question | TCP much larger than 1460 bytes? TCP much larger than 1460 bytes? I do not understand, why a see a lot of packets much larger than 1460 bytes. On differe |
| 2019-10-11 10:55:20 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2019-10-11 10:55:20 +0000 | answered a question | FTP passive port calculation? found the answer here: https://www.melvinswebstuff.com/blog/2009/04/24/calculate-ftp-data-port/ first value * 256 + sec |
| 2019-10-11 10:48:49 +0000 | asked a question | FTP passive port calculation? FTP passive port calculation? Does anybody know, how the passive port in FTP is calculated? Usually, the server-ip-addr |
Copyright Wireshark Foundation, 2017-2022 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.