grahamb's profile - activity

The OS you're using would help. Works fine for me on a 4k 43" monitor on Windows 10 with the Wireshark preferences font

1.8.15 is an extremely old version of Wireshark and there have been many, many changes since then.You should upgrade to

TCP Port numbers reused Hi experts, For the pcap, SYN、SYN/ACK、RST、SYN、SYN/ACK、RST, When I ignore the No.4 SYN packet,Wh

TCP Port numbers reused Hi experts, For the pcap, SYN、SYN/ACK、RST、SYN、SYN/ACK、RST, When I ignore the No.4 SYN packet,Wh

Also Wireshark profiles may be different on the two instances.

Custom ecpri dissector based on original implementation Hello, I need some modification to basic epan/dissectors/packet

Can't you manage updates through whatever other automation solution you have, e.g. for OS updates?

Duplicate of https://ask.wireshark.org/question/34126/bitbake-wireshark-423-stuck-at-99/

Mostly this issue comes up when systems are too old or are not up to date with MS updates and a pre-requisite is missing

Seems expected for tunnel mode, from code of kernel. xfrm_input .... if (x->outer_mode->flags & XFRM_MODE

Probably your capture setup doesn't permit the capture of the required info. This is particularly likely if your enviro

This is not a Wireshark project issue, BitBake is not a supported build system. I have no experience whatsoever with Bit

That looks like a question for the BitBake folks, or the producer of the recipe for the Wireshark build.

Winpcap is dead, although Wireshark is able to use it if it's the only capture library available, this isn't recommended

Maybe the OSX section of the WLAN Capture Setup wiki page will help.

ERROR MESSAGE WHEN STOPPING/RESTARTING CAPTURE I receive the following error message when stopping the capture: Error f

It does not have the same functionality as the npcap installer isn't included so you won't be able to capture traffic.

Don't scrape text from the dialog, use the "Copy to Clipboard" button. One of my best ever contributions to the project

E.g. a public file share. Unfortunately this is required otherwise spammers will abuse the "free" upload option. Karma

E.g. a public file share. Unfortunately this is required otherwise spammers will abuse the "free" upload option.

Captures can be uploaded to a public file share and a link to the file posted back here. Unfortunately this is required

E.g. a public file share.

"unable to ste channel or offset" when switching WiFi channels Hi, When I switch from channel 1 to another channel (e.g

Heading a long way out of my comfort zone, I think you add the PPA to your apt sources, apt update and then the newer ve

A core developer does provide up to date builds for Debian and Ubuntu but I don't know any more than that. For Ubuntu s

Not a Wireshark question. The switch, which is likely to be managed as you mention VLANs, may have a UI or may support

Both of the products you mention are not part of the Wireshark project so you'll have to look for the appropriate suppor

Wireshark has a preference setting that adjusts the displayed time, see the user guide: https://www.wireshark.org/docs/w

Is there a way to analise socks5 protocol and decode it? Hi! I'm using none-default server port and successfully capturi

Is there a way to analise socks5 protocol and decode it? Hi! I'm using none-default server port and successfully capturi

As per the man page, a "read filter" filters packets using display filter syntax, any that are excluded by the filter ar

The bleeding edge installers that have all the latest commits are available at https://www.wireshark.org/download/automa

Mikrotik seem to offer some form of packet capture: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Tools/Packet_Sniffer

Try Chris Greer's beginners guide here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLW8bTPfXNGdC5Co0VnBK1yVzAwSSphzpJ

From a remarkably similar physical connection here is filter to another device that is functioning ok(port 44818 all goo

The client fails to connect as there is no response to the SYN packet.

Web server works but not proprietary software with IP address. Below is host filter by problem IP. Is there anything pra

And is there a server running on the good IP and not on the failing IP? Can you check on the server if the required por

Likely the traffic is being blocked or dropped. Wireshark is unable to tell you why.

Probably no server listening (or traffic is blocked) on the target port.

I found the answer/statement in the post https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/promiscuous-mode-for-vm.84239/ My Summary: