| 2020-11-07 03:04:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2020-11-07 03:04:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2018-11-19 07:35:06 +0000 | commented answer | NAS-5GS wrong length definitions? Hi Anders, One more small correction that may be needed is with AMF Set ID. As you mentioned this was constructed rathe |
| 2018-11-15 06:46:07 +0000 | commented answer | NAS-5GS wrong length definitions? Wow! That was fast! I tried again with the current latest "Wireshark-win64-2.9.0-2539-g99c4e96b" now and it decodes the |
| 2018-11-15 06:04:21 +0000 | commented answer | NAS-5GS wrong length definitions? Thank you, Anders. Yes, indeed I checked and I saw that the current definitions of these fields in Wireshark are in line |
| 2018-11-14 13:26:06 +0000 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2018-11-14 13:26:06 +0000 | edited question | NAS-5GS wrong length definitions? NAS-5GS wrong length definitons? Hi, I find some definitions in NAS-5GS protol strange - such as: NAS protocol spec (3 |
| 2018-11-14 13:25:52 +0000 | asked a question | NAS-5GS wrong length definitions? NAS-5GS wrong length definitons? Hi, I find some definitions in NAS-5GS protol strange - such as: NAS protocol spec (3 |
Copyright Wireshark Foundation, 2017-2023 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.