2023-03-17 09:20:34 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder |
2023-03-17 09:20:34 +0000 | answered a question | Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? The wireshark version I see this issue on is: Version 4.0.1 (v4.0.1-0-ge9f3970b1527). Today I also tested the same trac |
2023-03-16 16:01:05 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder |
2023-03-16 16:01:05 +0000 | answered a question | Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? Link to screen capture of wireshark is here: https://snipboard.io/Swf4as.jpg |
2023-03-16 15:49:33 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2023-03-16 15:49:33 +0000 | answered a question | Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? Thanks Graham I agree, I will look around to find a public share and past link here. For now below might be more readabl |
2023-03-16 12:56:43 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2023-03-16 12:56:43 +0000 | answered a question | Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? I am new here at the Q&A and so far not allowed to upload files so I have to go with the textual output of tshark: 4 |
2023-03-16 12:40:40 +0000 | asked a question | Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? Are these tcp acked unseen segments really unseen? I see that wireshark is flagging below packets as tcp acked uncseen s |
2023-03-16 12:40:40 +0000 | asked a question | Why is wireshark analysing these as tcp acked unseen segements Why is wireshark analysing these as tcp acked unseen segements I see that wireshark is flagging below packets as tcp ack |