hugo.vanderkooij's profile - activity

Sounds rather silly if you have teachers that don't know how to do simple tasks. In my view there is a more fundamenta

I guess you missed this part in the unbound advertisement: To help increase online privacy, Unbound supports DNS-ov

Actually if you have a non encrypted connection you can read the detail from the packets. For example with SIP you can l

Actually packets out of order might not be a problem. After all it'ssort of how the internet was designed to work. Som

Wireshark is like a good hammer. If you are a carpenter you want the best hammer and you know how to use it. If you expe

I/O graphs might work for you. But all you can get from a packet capture is the actual throughput during the capture. W

If you need professional assistance I suggest you go about and hire someone to assist you. If you have a specific Wires

I am not a LUA expert. But in the good old days of 8 bit assemblers it was a matter of masking and bitshift action. That

I am not a LUA expert. But in the good old days of 8 bit assemblers it was a matter of masking and bitshift action. That

A quick dig around seems to indicate that you need to go for the source code. I found the ethertypes listed in an includ

There might be a few issues in regard to performance. So make sure you test the interface well before you start to trust

Gerald wrote: I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 3.5.0. So if you are brave use it instead of 3.4.8

This has all the tell tale signs of a MTU issue where the tunnel requires a smaller MTU but fails to learn that. A captu

Any way. Bugs are better reported at the gitlab place with all the other bugs. This is not the place to report bugs.

Not sure what your actual question is. But DNS qeuries can be read and in alot of cases you can guestimate who is askin

Please note that you may not see all access points. There could be rogue ones using another SSID, so just a wireshark p

Did you read https://www.adafruit.com/product/2269 and https://learn.adafruit.com/introducing-the-adafruit-bluefruit-le-

That is ARP working as it should. Why that host insists on polling each and every host in it's local subnet is something

In a TCP session toy will see RST packets if you try to send anything else when the first FIN is seen. But if you only

Also check your CPU. Your capture may be running on 1 CPU core only and that will most likely not manage to capture 10Gb

Good luck But this is not a wireshark question.

Not much to go on in your question. PLease elaborate more on what you want to achieve and what your network looks like.

Unless you have used a filter you should see all packets.

Most likely not. Either accept the switch is unmanaged as-is or do a factory reset and configure the switch as needed. B

Can you check if https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/17506 is your problem?

Not much to go on here. Frankly this could be just bad luck. but if you think it is a bug then please submit a bug repor

To be honest. I am not sure what you try to accomplish here. But it seems that you interpreted USERNAME as a literal tex

To be honest. I am not sure what you try to accomplish here. But it seems that you interpreted USERNAME as a literal tex

I would guess you need to compile it yourself. You can find the source code on gitlab : https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wir

Always considere the environment before your considere printing ;-)

Be aware that Ethernet packets are supposed to be at least 64 bytes. So it may depend on where in the stack you capture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLvrvfHPvWI To be honest there are a few good video's that explain you how too use Wire