| 2024-03-21 16:38:53 +0000 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2024-03-21 16:38:53 +0000 | edited answer | ICCP/TASE.2 Procotol Disector/TestSimulation Hi, Well, I hope you find an answer. But for others who are starting their research here is a tip: ICCP uses the "mms" p |
| 2024-03-20 17:46:33 +0000 | answered a question | ICCP/TASE.2 Procotol Disector/TestSimulation Hi, Well, I hope you find an answer. But for over who are starting there research here a tip: ICCP uses "mms" protocol. |
| 2021-11-03 19:29:56 +0000 | commented answer | iec61850 filtering in wireshark OK, it works also for my own capture, after changing the TPKT port to 103 first then back to 102... So look like a minor |
| 2021-11-03 19:02:41 +0000 | commented answer | iec61850 filtering in wireshark I forget to say that I have also added a PRES Context ID 3 / OID 1.0.9506.2.1 |
| 2021-11-03 18:56:47 +0000 | commented answer | iec61850 filtering in wireshark I am using 3.4.9-0. I have tried to edit my note because it was not working on the first attempt. Then I have changed th |
| 2021-11-03 17:47:51 +0000 | commented answer | iec61850 filtering in wireshark No, it does not. Note that I have also tried to use the "Decode As" option for tcp.port == 102, but MMS (or Pres) is not |
| 2020-07-23 18:21:51 +0000 | answered a question | IEC 104 MESSAGES This is a really old message... So if you are still looking for an answer: - I can record only messages on port 2404. wh |