| 2024-04-12 22:21:12 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2024-04-12 22:21:12 +0000 | answered a question | 3.6.22 release notes & 4.0.14 release notes missing It should be fixed now. |
| 2024-01-04 21:44:00 +0000 | commented question | Wireshark 4.2.0 does not work on Windows Server Core According to QTBUG-117845 and https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-114115, Qt 6.5 and later require the DirectCompositi |
| 2023-07-31 17:08:05 +0000 | commented answer | Wireshark manufacturer database on gitlab is broken The output of tshark -G manuf from the master branch is now periodically copied to https://www.wireshark.org/download/au |
| 2023-02-09 18:23:42 +0000 | commented answer | Just installed 4.0.3 (arm64 on macOS 13.1), and suddenly chmodBPF is no longer working. Help? This sounds like issue 18734. The current recommended fix is to For now (Feb 2023), download a development release fro |
| 2023-02-09 18:23:06 +0000 | answered a question | Upgraded Mac M1 to Ventura 13.1. The upgrade broke Wireshark. This sounds like issue 18734. The current recommended fix is to For now (Feb 2023), download a development release fro |
| 2023-02-09 17:55:29 +0000 | received badge | ● Commentator |
| 2023-02-09 17:55:29 +0000 | commented answer | Just installed 4.0.3 (arm64 on macOS 13.1), and suddenly chmodBPF is no longer working. Help? This sounds like issue 18734. |
| 2022-12-02 22:06:37 +0000 | commented answer | Is there any official documentation to confirm that Wireshark is TAA Compliant? We don't have any official TAA compliance statement, but the official Wireshark packages are built in the US, and the ma |
| 2021-05-20 20:40:51 +0000 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
| 2021-05-19 17:03:16 +0000 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2021-05-14 01:09:22 +0000 | answered a question | I have fatal error LNK1181 when rebuild wireshark on Window This should be fixed in https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/3004. |
| 2021-05-06 20:35:09 +0000 | commented answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? @Boolean263 The KDE CoC could definitely use clearer instructions for resolution. Maybe that's something we could add? |
| 2021-05-06 13:06:46 +0000 | received badge | ● Favorite Question (source) |
| 2021-05-05 11:37:03 +0000 | received badge | ● Great Answer (source) |
| 2021-05-05 11:36:49 +0000 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
| 2021-05-05 08:35:15 +0000 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
| 2021-05-05 05:26:03 +0000 | received badge | ● Good Answer (source) |
| 2021-05-05 05:24:01 +0000 | received badge | ● Nice Answer (source) |
| 2021-05-05 03:22:22 +0000 | received badge | ● Self-Learner (source) |
| 2021-05-05 01:14:47 +0000 | edited answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We should adpot the Go Community Code of Conduct: https://golang.org/conduct. |
| 2021-05-05 01:13:37 +0000 | commented answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? Of the CoCs I've read so far, this most closely matches how Wireshark works (at least, how I experience how Wireshark wo |
| 2021-05-05 01:12:48 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2021-05-05 01:12:48 +0000 | answered a question | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We shouldn't adopt a code of conduct. |
| 2021-05-05 01:12:30 +0000 | commented answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? This is used by quite a few organizations and projects, including the Linux Kernel. |
| 2021-05-05 01:12:17 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2021-05-05 01:12:17 +0000 | answered a question | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We should adpot the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_condu |
| 2021-05-05 01:11:57 +0000 | commented answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? I think this would also be a good match, although not quite as good as the KDE one. |
| 2021-05-05 01:11:37 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2021-05-05 01:11:37 +0000 | answered a question | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We should adpot the Go Community Code of Conduct: https://golang.org/conduct. |
| 2021-05-05 01:11:12 +0000 | commented answer | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? Of the CoCs I've read so far, this most closely matches how Wireshark works (at least, how I experience how Wireshark wo |
| 2021-05-05 01:10:51 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2021-05-05 01:10:51 +0000 | answered a question | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We should adopt the KDE Community Code of Conduct: https://kde.org/code-of-conduct/. |
| 2021-05-05 01:10:27 +0000 | asked a question | Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? Should we adopt a code of conduct? If so, which one? We've discussed adopting a code of conduct for Wireshark a few time |
| 2021-05-03 22:57:12 +0000 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2021-04-29 16:35:11 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2021-04-29 16:35:11 +0000 | answered a question | Does wireshark.net domain belongs to wireshark.org? We (the Wireshark Foundation) do own wireshark.net, along with a few other Wireshark-related domains such as wireshark.n |
| 2020-11-20 21:40:14 +0000 | commented answer | WiresharkPortable 3.4.0 suspected of malware? If it helps, false positives happen often enough that we maintain a list of them. |
| 2020-06-17 15:19:43 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2020-06-17 15:19:43 +0000 | answered a question | ANONSVN not responding The instance was hung and I restarted it. It should be back up now. |
| 2020-01-15 22:35:41 +0000 | received badge | ● Necromancer (source) |
| 2020-01-15 20:28:01 +0000 | edited answer | how to download latest wireshark version dynamically? The download site and mirrors now have links to the latest release versions, e.g. https://1.na.dl.wireshark.org/win64/ n |
| 2020-01-15 20:27:46 +0000 | answered a question | how to download latest wireshark version dynamically? The download site and mirrors now have links to the latest release versions, e.g. https://1.na.dl.wireshark.org/win64/ n |
| 2020-01-03 18:57:18 +0000 | commented answer | Spanish localization Update: The change has been committed and synced with Transifex https://www.transifex.com/wireshark/wireshark/language/e |
| 2020-01-01 21:55:32 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2020-01-01 21:55:32 +0000 | answered a question | Spanish localization Full Spanish language support requires the following: A Spanish (es) language entry at Transifex: https://www.transife |
| 2019-12-18 18:17:11 +0000 | answered a question | Wireshark crashes in the “Enabled Protocols” dialog box This should be fixed in the master branch and in the impending 3.2.0 release. |
| 2019-09-06 20:20:26 +0000 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2019-03-15 00:04:26 +0000 | received badge | ● Famous Question (source) |
| 2018-12-11 00:52:22 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
Copyright Wireshark Foundation, 2017-2023 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.