Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

Is this a WireShark display issue?

I am using Wireshark to capture the 802.11be management frame. (Not able to add figure.) In the Association Request frame, one of the bit fields in ETH PHY Capabilities Information is displayed as: ETH PHY Bits 64-71 0X111100. However, the 1111 is extra bits and not defined in the 802.11be spec. I check that it will change to 4444 in the Association Response frame from an AP. Please let me know if you face the same issue. Thank you!

click to hide/show revision 2
None

Is this a WireShark display issue?

I am using Wireshark to capture the 802.11be management frame. (Not able to add figure.) In the Association Request frame, one of the bit fields in ETH PHY Capabilities Information is displayed as: ETH PHY Bits 64-71 0X111100. However, the 1111 is extra bits and not defined in the 802.11be spec. I check that it will change to 4444 in the Association Response frame from an AP. Please let me know if you face the same issue. Thank you!

Is this a WireShark display issue?an issue with decoding the 802.11be management frame ETH PHY Bits 64-71?

I am using Wireshark to capture the 802.11be management frame. (Not able to add figure.) In the Association Request frame, one of the bit fields in ETH PHY Capabilities Information is displayed as: ETH PHY Bits 64-71 0X111100. However, the 1111 is extra bits and not defined in the 802.11be spec. I check that it will change to 4444 in the Association Response frame from an AP. Please let me know if you face the same issue. Thank you!

Is this an issue with decoding the 802.11be management frame ETH EHT PHY Bits 64-71?

I am using Wireshark to capture the 802.11be management frame. (Not able to add figure.) In the Association Request frame, one of the bit fields in ETH EHT PHY Capabilities Information is displayed as: ETH EHT PHY Bits 64-71 0X111100. However, the 1111 is extra bits and not defined in the 802.11be spec. I check that it will change to 4444 in the Association Response frame from an AP. Please let me know if you face the same issue. Thank you!