I don't use any decryption way.
Isn't http3 already solving the problem that existed in previous versions? There isn't much plaintext information in the packet, like SNI. Why does Wireshark know the URL?How do that?
 | 1 | initial version |
I don't use any decryption way.
Isn't http3 already solving the problem that existed in previous versions? There isn't much plaintext information in the packet, like SNI. Why does Wireshark know the URL?How do that?
http://m.qpic.cn/psc?/V52a0KMa3nghGQ3D3tx11KCdxF4Eivkh/TmEUgtj9EK6.7V8ajmQrEFR8CzHXlDdGyjthd3cHTuan8HCpTpLApUm.M1i2wFSICcqs16hZRCfQ5qaYw3Ct5UOLi1GJghDwflDBoikWI!/b&bo=8QaFA*EGhQMDByI!&rf=viewer_4
I don't use any decryption way.
Isn't http3 already solving the problem that existed in previous versions? There isn't much plaintext information in the packet, like SNI. Why does Wireshark know the URL?How do that?
http://m.qpic.cn/psc?/V52a0KMa3nghGQ3D3tx11KCdxF4Eivkh/TmEUgtj9EK6.7V8ajmQrEFR8CzHXlDdGyjthd3cHTuan8HCpTpLApUm.M1i2wFSICcqs16hZRCfQ5qaYw3Ct5UOLi1GJghDwflDBoikWI!/b&bo=8QaFA*EGhQMDByI!&rf=viewer_4
https://cdn.hh010.com/data/attachment/forum/201907/01/174440nnxll0ax7zgnbzl2.png
I don't use any decryption way.
Isn't http3 already solving the problem that existed in previous versions? There isn't much plaintext information in the packet, like SNI. Why does Wireshark know the URL?How do that?
| | 5 | No.5 Revision |
https://cdn.hh010.com/data/attachment/forum/202412/07/020623d6dg7y7ul4y6fa44.png
https://cdn.hh010.com/data/attachment/forum/202412/07/020622rxu3iypj4yt2x3li.png
https://cdn.hh010.com/data/attachment/forum/202412/07/020622rxu3iypj4yt2x3li.png
I don't use any decryption way. Capture QUIC，I can see the url in "Decrypted QUIC“ and ”Reassembled TLS Handshake“ Isn't http3 already solving the problem that existed in previous versions? There isn't much plaintext information in the packet, like SNI. Why does Wireshark know the URL?How do that?