| 2023-07-31 01:44:29 +0000 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2021-11-16 12:18:03 +0000 | received badge | ● Favorite Question (source) |
| 2021-06-25 08:08:03 +0000 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
| 2020-07-15 20:29:58 +0000 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
| 2020-03-24 19:19:22 +0000 | commented question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Yes, SACKs are enabled at both endpoints. Will try to upload the whole conversation shortly. |
| 2020-03-21 20:31:29 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:30:15 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:29:56 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:27:36 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:26:34 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:26:09 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:25:45 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:24:40 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:24:04 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:15:13 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted |
| 2020-03-21 20:14:09 +0000 | edited question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet break TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted p |
| 2020-03-21 20:13:30 +0000 | asked a question | Retransmitted packet breaks TCP sequence Retransmitted packet break TCP sequence Troubleshooting a case where a packet is re-transmitted but the re-transmitted p |
| 2019-05-02 23:16:58 +0000 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
| 2019-05-02 13:17:47 +0000 | commented answer | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Christian, we've ran in this configuration (active-active) for years and it will be a hard sell to have many 10 gig link |
| 2019-05-02 13:07:46 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. We setup monitor sessions on each switch. On the B side the 2 monitor sessions are fed into a packet broker. The capture |
| 2019-05-01 16:27:01 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. It seems odd that in certain times the receiver only acks packets that are not full length size (and out of order) even |
| 2019-05-01 11:34:41 +0000 | received badge | ● Nice Question (source) |
| 2019-04-30 13:29:06 +0000 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
| 2019-04-29 19:19:33 +0000 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
| 2019-04-29 14:24:01 +0000 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
| 2019-04-29 14:24:01 +0000 | answered a question | Packet sent repeatedly with decreasing TTL Looks like you have some sort of networking loop. If you look at the packet ID, it is the same. |
| 2019-04-29 13:42:07 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Captures with one of the port channel legs down. |
| 2019-04-28 01:34:09 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Thanks Christian, we are not using active-standby port channels. Where do you see the packet loss? I see exactly the sam |
| 2019-04-28 01:32:35 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Thanks Christian, we are not using active-standby port channels. Where do you see the packet loss, I see exactly the sam |
| 2019-04-28 01:31:57 +0000 | commented question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Thanks Christian, we are not using active-standby port channels. Where do you see the packet loss, I see exactly the sam |
| 2019-04-26 17:32:27 +0000 | edited question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Got this weird case of low throughput |
| 2019-04-26 17:31:29 +0000 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
| 2019-04-26 17:31:29 +0000 | edited question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Got this weird case of low throughput |
| 2019-04-26 17:30:52 +0000 | asked a question | Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Low throughput between vmWare hosts in vxlan topology - spurious retransmissions. Got this weird case of low throughput |