Ask Your Question

Alois Schönbächler's profile - activity

2020-03-24 04:05:31 +0000 commented answer RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

Excellent work!

2020-03-24 04:01:04 +0000 marked best answer RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

About Wireshark

Version 3.2.1 (v3.2.1-0-gbf38a67724d0)

 No.     Time           Source                Destination           Protocol Length Info
      17 2.335661       192.168.43.207        185.48.228.213        OSCORE   83     CON, MID:2, POST, /
 Frame 17: 83 bytes on wire (664 bits), 83 bytes captured (664 bits) on interface \Device\NPF_{F43FBF10-2A51-4899-AD1DDB3D426FB591}, id 0
 Ethernet II, Src: Microsof_bb:d6:95 (f0:6e:0b:bb:d6:95), Dst: XiaomiCo_2d:2b:5e (7c:03:ab:2d:2b:5e)
 Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.43.207, Dst: 185.48.228.213
 User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 53647, Dst Port: 5683 
 Constrained Application Protocol, Confirmable, POST, MID:2
     01.. .... = Version: 1
     ..00 .... = Type: Confirmable (0)
     .... 0000 = Token Length: 0
     Code: POST (2)
     Message ID: 2
     Opt Name: #1: Uri-Path: (null)
         Opt Desc: Type 11, Critical, Unsafe
         1011 .... = Opt Delta: 11 
         .... 0000 = Opt Length: 0
         Uri-Path: 
     Opt Name: #2: Object-Security: Key ID:102030405060708090a0b0c0, Key ID Context:(null), Partial IV:01234567
         Opt Desc: Type 21, Critical, Safe    
         1010 .... = Opt Delta: 10  
         .... 1101 = Opt Length: 13 
         Opt Length extended: 4
         0... .... = Non-compressed COSE message: False
         .0.. .... = Expanded Flag Byte: False      
         ..0. .... = Signature Present: False 
         ...0 .... = Key ID Context Present: False  
         .... 1... = Key ID Present: True 
         .... .100 = Partial IV Length: 4 
         Partial IV: 01234567 
         Key ID: 102030405060708090a0b0c0
     End of options marker: 255  
     [Uri-Path: /]  
     Encrypted OSCORE Data
         Payload Desc: application/octet-stream
         [Payload Length: 16] 
 Data (16 bytes)
 0000  00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f   ................ 
    Data: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f  
    [Length: 16] Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments
    [Expert Info (Warning/Undecoded): Security context not set - can't decrypt]
         [Security context not set - can't decrypt]
         [Severity level: Warning]
         [Group: Undecoded]
2020-03-24 04:01:04 +0000 received badge  Scholar (source)
2020-03-23 02:15:24 +0000 commented question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

Thanks! ...

2020-03-23 01:16:04 +0000 commented question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

Guy Harris just formatted my Wireshark trace. He did a great Job.

2020-03-23 00:52:52 +0000 commented question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

The upload of screen shots is not possible. (I have less than 60 Points)

2020-03-23 00:36:55 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option.

2020-03-23 00:18:19 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option.

2020-03-23 00:13:47 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option.

2020-03-22 23:50:26 +0000 commented question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

About Wireshark Version 3.2.1 (v3.2.1-0-gbf38a67724d0)

2020-03-22 23:48:13 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option.

2020-03-22 23:14:00 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option.

2020-03-22 23:12:27 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar

2020-03-22 23:08:06 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar

2020-03-22 23:07:47 +0000 received badge  Editor (source)
2020-03-22 23:07:47 +0000 edited question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar

2020-03-22 22:55:55 +0000 asked a question RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613?

RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar