2020-03-24 04:05:31 +0000 | commented answer | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? Excellent work! |
2020-03-24 04:01:04 +0000 | marked best answer | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? About Wireshark Version 3.2.1 (v3.2.1-0-gbf38a67724d0) |
2020-03-24 04:01:04 +0000 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2020-03-23 02:15:24 +0000 | commented question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? Thanks! ... |
2020-03-23 01:16:04 +0000 | commented question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? Guy Harris just formatted my Wireshark trace. He did a great Job. |
2020-03-23 00:52:52 +0000 | commented question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? The upload of screen shots is not possible. (I have less than 60 Points) |
2020-03-23 00:36:55 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. |
2020-03-23 00:18:19 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. |
2020-03-23 00:13:47 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. |
2020-03-22 23:50:26 +0000 | commented question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? About Wireshark Version 3.2.1 (v3.2.1-0-gbf38a67724d0) |
2020-03-22 23:48:13 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. |
2020-03-22 23:14:00 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. |
2020-03-22 23:12:27 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar |
2020-03-22 23:08:06 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar |
2020-03-22 23:07:47 +0000 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2020-03-22 23:07:47 +0000 | edited question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar |
2020-03-22 22:55:55 +0000 | asked a question | RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE) defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshark seems to use the number 21 instead. Is there a newer Wireshark version that will follow RFC8613? RFC8613 Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments defines the Coap Option number 9 as OSCORE Option. Wireshar |