1 | initial version |
Somewhere in here is the quintessential answer to this but I'm not finding it right now. (something like this)
For filters, is there a facility to include the next packet in the sequence for a selected criteria?
MATE may be a solution but at a certain point you'll have to decide if it's not the right tool.
If you're open to writing code/scripts, Wireshark Lua (WSDG: Lua Support in Wireshark) is very flexible after making the initial time investment to get comfortable with it.
2 | No.2 Revision |
Somewhere in here is the quintessential answer to this but I'm not finding it right now. (something like this)
For filters, is there a facility to include the next packet in the sequence for a selected criteria?
MATE may be a solution but at a certain point you'll have to decide if it's not the right tool.
If you're open to writing code/scripts, Wireshark Lua (WSDG: Lua Support in Wireshark) is very flexible after making the initial time investment to get comfortable with it.
YMMV but there is also a lot that can be done with tshark
and shell scripts.
https://www.youtube.com/@WireSharkFest/search?query=tshark
3 | No.3 Revision |
Somewhere in here is the quintessential answer to this but I'm not finding it right now. (something like this)
For filters, is there a facility to include the next packet in the sequence for a selected criteria?
MATE may be a solution but at a certain point you'll have to decide if it's not the right tool.
If you're open to writing code/scripts, Wireshark Lua (WSDG: Lua Support in Wireshark) is very flexible after making the initial time investment to get comfortable with it.
YMMV but there is also a lot that can be done with tshark
and shell scripts.
https://www.youtube.com/@WireSharkFest/search?query=tshark
Filter TLS with no Server Hello
The answers include two different Lua solutions for comparing packets.