 | 1 | initial version |
HI, I know it's a discussion a while ago, but I do have a question similar to this. In one of the two attached pics, you can see the packet #229 has the "TCP Port numbers reused" message. However in the other pic, the packet #209 doesn't have this message. Both were sending the SYN,ACK message. Could anyone of you tell me what's the difference between the two? Is there something I should concern? What I can see the difference is the different in length, one is 66 bytes and the other is 60 bytes.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EvZxYAkLHsWrV9P5rn7wUxBXfj3h9Ral/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yTAJJtPpZF8o5g_vz2O8mZTCEbdwxYy4/view?usp=sharing
Thank you.
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
HI, I know it's a discussion a while ago, but I do have a question similar to this. In one of the two attached pics, you can see the packet #229 has the "TCP Port numbers reused" message. However in the other pic, the packet #209 doesn't have this message. Both were sending the SYN,ACK message. Could anyone of you tell me what's the difference between the two? Is there something I should concern? What I can see the difference is the different in length, one is 66 bytes and the other is 60 bytes.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EvZxYAkLHsWrV9P5rn7wUxBXfj3h9Ral/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EvZxYAkLHsWrV9P5rn7wUxBXfj3h9Ral/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yTAJJtPpZF8o5g_vz2O8mZTCEbdwxYy4/view?usp=sharing
Thank you.
