 | 1 | initial version |
To access data inside the packet, use the following syntax: proto [ expr : size ] Proto is one of ether, fddi, tr, wlan, ppp, slip, link, ip, arp, rarp, tcp, udp, sctp, icmp, ip6 or radio, and indicates the protocol layer for the index operation. (ether, fddi, wlan, tr, ppp, slip and link all refer to the link layer. radio refers to the "radio header" added to some 802.11 captures.)
Note that tcp, udp and other upper-layer protocol types only apply to IPv4, not IPv6 (this will be fixed in the future)
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
To access data inside the packet, use the following syntax: proto [ expr : size ] Proto is one of ether, fddi, tr, wlan, ppp, slip, link, ip, arp, rarp, tcp, udp, sctp, icmp, ip6 or radio, and indicates the protocol layer for the index operation. (ether, fddi, wlan, tr, ppp, slip and link all refer to the link layer. radio refers to the "radio header" added to some 802.11 captures.)
Note that tcp, udp and other upper-layer protocol types only apply to IPv4, not IPv6 (this will be fixed in the future)
@guy-harris - is there another spot this might be tracked as an enhancement request?
expression rejects all packets for IPv6 upper-layer protocol #600
"Closing as resolved (not a bug, but an improvement that remains to be made)."
Better IPv6 support for higher level protocols #864
"Let's close this as a duplicate of #600, which stands for the same problem and was opened much earlier."
| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
To access data inside the packet, use the following syntax: proto [ expr : size ] Proto is one of ether, fddi, tr, wlan, ppp, slip, link, ip, arp, rarp, tcp, udp, sctp, icmp, ip6 or radio, and indicates the protocol layer for the index operation. (ether, fddi, wlan, tr, ppp, slip and link all refer to the link layer. radio refers to the "radio header" added to some 802.11 captures.)
Note that tcp, udp and other upper-layer protocol types only apply to IPv4, not IPv6 (this will be fixed in the future)
@guy-harris - is there another spot this might be tracked as It's been acknowledged but I don't see an enhancement request?open issue tracking it.
expression rejects all packets for IPv6 upper-layer protocol #600
"Closing as resolved (not a bug, but an improvement that remains to be made)."
Better IPv6 support for higher level protocols #864
"Let's close this as a duplicate of #600, which stands for the same problem and was opened much earlier."
